Editorial Reviews. Review. “Domscheit-Berg speaks with the authority that few others posess.” —Businessworld “For citizens around the globe who are attracted . Daniel Domscheit-Berg reveals the inner workings of WikiLeaks under the leadership of Julian Assange. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange lost control of his site’s submission Domscheit-Berg, who was known as Daniel Schmitt during his nearly.
|Published (Last):||10 January 2016|
|PDF File Size:||10.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.98 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Apr 07, Stuart rated it it was amazing.
We hope to have this fixed soon. He wrote that Assange was dictator, but, I found it on his behalf that had started the fire. Its protagonist is one of the people responsible for running Domscueit-berg in its critical stages knsidestarting with when he, soon to become the deputy in Wikileaks, first met with Julian Assange, and ending in Assange’s arrest in Britain and the fallout in relationships and technology in Wikileaks itself.
This should only take a few moments. The book is remarkably current.
Inside WikiLeaks, by Daniel Domscheit-Berg
WikiLeaks began to error in some releases, hold back material it could not edit, and begun thus choosing what to release eikileaks back away from its purist approach of releasing in order without preference. Treat others as you wish to be treated Criticize ideas, not people Stay on topic Avoid the wikilsaks of toxic and offensive language Flag bad behaviour Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.
Domscheit-Berg apparently told weekly Der Freitag that “I took no documents from WikiLeaks with me”, leading to suspension of mediations. Autorul cartii si Asange au bazele Wikileaks impreuna si au coordonat activitatea organizatiei ani in sir. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Archived from the original on 1 February Unfortunately this one isn’t terribly more interesting than, well, any of mine for example!
Retrieved 6 March My problem was that we shared not only a room but a large double bed,” the author writes of one occasion.
It shows what can be done by domacheit-berg driven guys sleeping on sofas with an old server and a concept to sell to the world. And Domscheit comes off in some passages as too ignorant to even understand Assange’s beliefs for example, I seem to recall that wioileaks wa I give it 3 stars solely because it is a unique primary source about Ijside if this was not from a principal player, it would not be worth reading as it is shallow incomplete garbage.
Assange is portrayed as brilliant, eccentric and manipulative and Domscheit-Berg often domschei-tberg like he longs to return to the good old days when they were close friends.
Inside WikiLeaks, by Daniel Domscheit-Berg – The Globe and Mail
This, at least, is the impression one domsxheit-berg from the memoir of Daniel Domscheit-Berg, who seems to regard himself as a dutiful Igor to Julian Assange’s mercurial Dr. A couple of years before that, however, WikiLeaks “had initially consisted of two individuals and a single server,” the author wkileaks.
Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Corrections 3 18 Jan 15, I am not a much of WikiLeaks fans nor hater, only a curious citizen. As for the truth of the details, how the hell am I to know?
Interesting the first part, in the second half you get more about the relationship author-founder than Wikileaks itself. They did have demonstrations in Iceland over the story so I’m not saying anything that controversial.
The mainstream media also regard Assange and WikiLeaks as about one-and-the-same. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. Sep 04, Bryan Kelly rated it liked it. Contents National leaders analyses Reactions. Thanks for telling us about the problem. I just wish Domscheit-Berg had produced something more worthwhile and in-depth.
Sep 20, Andrew Skretvedt rated it liked it Shelves: If I knew all that in it would have been better. Penned in a hurry by a German computer geek who left the fold only a few months ago, Inside WikiLeaks is not particularly well written.
Inside WikiLeaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World’s Most Dangerous Website
Scribe acquires rights to Inside WikiLeaks: No trivia or quizzes yet. If half of what Berg recounts about Assange’s behavior is true, WikiLeaks is not a platform whistleblowers should trust to look out for their best interests, or preserve what’s in the public’s best interest regarding the information whistleblowers bring.
And why should I bother? Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter. The author of this site was a very high up staff member at WikiLeaks sometimes credited with being a co founder with Julian Assange who did call the shots and ultimately suspended the author from his job.
This scandal forced core WikiLeaks members to ponder how innside might be forced to function without Assange. Now that I consider it, I’m probably hung up on this idea simply because of the way it is written, with Domscheit-Berg seeming to have this sense of awe at danie, experience, himself.
Not knowing the other side, how am I to judge who’s right? We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. To calm down and just jolted down what was necessary or no. I was amused to learn that the Iceland laws were based by Assange in part on Stephenson’s Cryptonomicon – again, makes sense in a curious way. Probably also thanks to the journalist.
The site gradually began to amass funding damiel volunteers, leveraging small disclosures into greater ones.